4 Browser Security Truths in 2025: Not a Predictions List

Every January, the internet is flooded with cybersecurity predictions. AI will change everything, attackers will evolve, and phishing will somehow get even worse. We’ve all seen the same headlines, recycled year after year, each promising a glimpse into the future of security. But let’s be honest—most of these so-called predictions aren’t revolutionary. They’re just the inevitable next steps in trends we’ve been watching unfold for years.

I’ve hit my quota of those lists. No more vague forecasts or buzzword-heavy guesswork. Instead, let’s focus on what’s already happening—the hard truths security teams are facing right now. These aren’t future threats; they’re the cracks in our defenses that attackers are actively exploiting today. And at the center of it all? The browser.

The browser has quietly become the beating heart of modern work. It’s where employees access critical data, where business applications live, and where attackers are shifting their focus. Yet, network security strategies—such Secure Web Gateways (SWGs) and SSE technologies—are stuck wrapped around the experience. Built for an era of static filtering and perimeter-based defenses, network security defenses are failing to protect against the very threats shaping today’s landscape.

So let’s skip the predictions and talk about reality. Here are four undeniable truths about why SWGs are falling short—and what that means for the future of browser security.

Truth 1: Known Good is the New Bad

The security stack has always been a game of containment, with layers of defenses wrapped around workflows to block attackers. But attackers have stopped fighting those barriers. Instead, they’re leveraging the very tools security teams have forcefully allowed through—either for compatibility or to reduce false positives. Many security tools have become “whitelist central,” allowing entire categories of applications unrestricted access. The result?

• Living off Trusted Sites – Attackers use Google Drive, Dropbox, and Microsoft 365 to host phishing campaigns and malware delivery.
• Supply Chain Attacks via Extensions and Libraries – Malicious browser extensions and JavaScript supply chain attacks have become an entry point for persistent threats.
• Business Email Compromise (BEC) Proliferation – Attackers don’t need to break in when they can simply trick users into granting access through OAuth and fake app permissions.

Security has traditionally been about distinguishing good from bad. But when “good” tools are being weaponized, that distinction becomes meaningless. For browser security, this means shifting away from simplistic blocklists and toward real-time behavioral analysis that understands how users interact with web applications—not just where they are going.

Truth 2: Security Teams are Missing a Data Model

SWGs were created in an era before 95% of web and cloud traffic became TLS encrypted. Back then, it made sense to classify the browser under network security—it was just another way to access applications. But today, that model is broken. Security teams have a data model for email (messages and attachments), for the network (connections and traffic), and for the endpoint (processes and programs). What they don’t have is a model for the browser.

The DOM tree is the browser’s unique data model—a layer that presents, interacts, and connects all three existing security layers. But because traditional security tools don’t operate inside the browser, they have no visibility into how this data is used.

Without a browser-specific security layer, teams are left blind to:

• Credential theft happening within SaaS applications.
• User interactions that signal phishing or social engineering attempts.
• Data exfiltration through legitimate browser-based workflows.

The browser isn’t just a window to the internet—it’s the new operating system for work. But security teams are still treating it like a network connection. This means the future of browser security must focus on creating a dedicated security model for the browser itself—one that inspects user interactions, monitors real-time DOM activity, and enforces policies beyond simple network-based filtering.

Truth 3: Enterprise and Consumer Software Are the Same Thing

Once upon a time, corporate IT could control which apps employees used. Enterprise software had a clear perimeter, and security teams could confidently allow “business” applications while blocking “consumer” ones. That world is gone. SaaS has collapsed the boundary between personal and professional tools.

• ChatGPT traffic looks the same whether an employee is naming their new puppy or summarizing confidential company documents.
• Product-led growth means employees test new SaaS apps long before IT security knows they exist.
• A single Google or Microsoft account can be tied to both personal and business workflows, making security policies nearly impossible to enforce at scale.

SWGs were built for an era where security teams could reliably separate corporate and consumer applications. That’s no longer possible. Modern SaaS usage is fluid, user-driven, and entirely browser-based. Security tools that rely on binary “allow vs. deny” policies are completely unequipped to handle this reality.

What truly matters isn’t whether a destination is allowed or blocked, or whether an application is labeled as corporate or consumer. The real question is whether an employee’s interactions with the application are relevant to the business and if they are operating within the correct account context. Security needs to shift from binary allow/deny models to evaluating the intent and legitimacy of user actions within trusted applications. The future of browser security must embrace dynamic risk assessments, context-aware access controls, and real-time monitoring to differentiate between legitimate and potentially harmful SaaS interactions.

Truth 4: Identity is Unforgivably Linked to the Browser

The browser is now the closest digital layer to user identity. From authentication tokens and single sign-on (SSO) credentials to session cookies and MFA mechanisms, everything that proves who you are online lives in the browser. Attackers know this and have evolved their tactics accordingly.

• Session Hijacking & MFA Replay – Attackers steal active session cookies to bypass authentication and operate as legitimate users.
• Info-Stealing Malware – Browser-based threats extract stored credentials, autofill data, and saved passwords with ease.
• SaaS Account Takeovers – Adversaries abuse OAuth permissions and API integrations to silently infiltrate user accounts.

The rise of browser-based identity attacks exposes a fundamental flaw in legacy security models: they still treat authentication as a one-time event instead of an ongoing risk. Network and endpoint security tools fail to detect when a session has been compromised inside the browser. Without visibility into identity-based attacks at the browser layer, security teams are left reacting to breaches after they’ve already occurred. The future of browser security must prioritize continuous identity validation, session monitoring, and real-time anomaly detection at the browser level to prevent unauthorized access before it becomes a full-blown compromise.

The Bottom Line

The old paradigms of web security no longer apply. Attackers aren’t relying on “known bad” sites—they’re abusing trusted infrastructure. The browser has become the central work environment, yet security teams lack a proper data model for it. And the line between enterprise and consumer applications has blurred beyond recognition.

This isn’t a prediction—it’s the reality security teams are already facing. The question is whether we’ll keep pretending SWGs can solve problems they weren’t built for, or finally admit we need a new approach to browser security.

‍
- Ryan Boerner
CEO @ Keep Aware